Abstract:
This study investigated Vocabulary Learning Strategies as Predictors of EFL Freshman Students’
Written Receptive Vocabulary Size at Debre Tabor University: A Moderation Analysis of Gender
and Field of Specialization. The present study employed a convergent parallel mixed-methods
design, specifically, the concurrent triangulation design. The quantitative data were collected
through a vocabulary learning strategy questionnaire and vocabulary size test questions, while the
qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interview questions. The quantitative
study of the current study employed descriptive analysis such as statistics including frequency,
percentage, mean, and standard deviation, and inferential statistical analysis methods such as
independent sample t-tests, Pearson product-moment correlation, and linear multiple regression
analyses. Thematic analysis was applied to analyze and interpret the qualitative data. The findings
revealed that EFL freshman students were medium vocabulary learning strategy users. The results
also indicated that EFL freshman students used the discovery determination strategy most
frequently ( mean score=2.93) and the least used strategy was the memory strategy( mean
score=2.67). The independent sample t-tests result showed that no statistically significant
variances of gender and field of specialization(P=.096 and .115, respectively) across the six
vocabulary learning strategies. Furthermore, the findings of the current study revealed that there
is a significant positive relationship between perceived vocabulary learning strategies and written
receptive vocabulary knowledge among the target EFL students with the value of P= .000< .05).
In addition, the overall vocabulary learning strategy preferences have a significant positive linear
relationship with perceived written receptive vocabulary knowledge(R²=.0.194, F (6,349) =
13.971, P= .000< .05). Remarkably, while metacognitive, social consolidation, cognitive, social
determination, and memory strategy were analyzed, only determination strategy significantly
contributes to predicting students’ written receptive vocabulary knowledge. Moreover, data from
the semi-structured interviews showed that some students benefit from formal VLS instruction,
many rely on independent learning or receive only limited guidance, pointing to a possible lack of
consistent and explicit VLS teaching within the formal education system. Finally, the findings of
this study provide new insights with important implications for foreign language teaching theory,
pedagogy, and methodology, both within Debre Tabor University and in broader EFL contexts