dc.description.abstract |
ABSTRACT
Attempts to mitigate global climate change have brought forestry into focus. Forests absorb
carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, alleviate global warming and contribute for rural
livelihood. To realize these benefits, there is a need to conserve the existing forests and
establish new forests by using different restoration techniques. Information is scarce in
Ethiopia on the carbon stock efficiency of the different forest types. The objective of this study
was to compare biomass and soil carbon stock potential of a natural forest, exclosure, and
Eucalyptus plantation. Systematic and random sampling technique was used for vegetation
and soil data sampling. For inventory of vegetation data, 80 plots with plot size of 20m x 20m
were used. For soil data collection and sampling of litter, herb and grass, a 1m x 1m sample
plot was used. Allometric equations were employed for the calculation of above ground
biomass and carbon stock. The mean above ground, below ground, litter and soil carbon
stocks for the exclosure were 5.9 ± 19.9, 1.5 ± 5.2, 0.9 ± 0.8 and 123.2 ± 31.4 ton/ha, for the
Eucalyptus plantation 11.9 ± 8.0,3.1 ±2.1, 2.6 ± 1.4 and 142.5 ± 37.7 ton/ha and for natural
forest 8.3 ± 16.0, 2.2 ± 4.2, 3.3 ± 1.2 and 181.6 ± 46.7 ton/ha respectively. The total mean
carbon stock for exclosure was 131.6 ± 45.5 ton/ha, for plantation 160.1 ± 35.8 ton/ha and
for natural forest 195.3 ± 58.3 ton/ha. The carbon stocks in each pool exhibited distinct
patterns between the forest types. The above ground, below ground and soil organic carbon
stock increased in the natural forests and plantation, while the litter carbon stock showed
decreasing towards the exclosure. Higher amount of aboveground carbon in plantation forest
and soil carbon stock found in the natural forest. In total natural forests store high amount of
carbon, this can play an important role in climate change mitigation. The carbon pool
variation between different forest types was significant at (P < 0.05); however, there was no
significance difference between forest types by aboveground and belowground biomass.
Therefore, climate change mitigation measures should consider expanding exclosure with the
same priority as conserving natural forest and increasing plantation forests.
Keywords: Natural forest, Plantation forest, Exclosure, Carbon stock and sequestration,
Climate change. |
en_US |