Abstract:
ABSTRACT
A study on milk production handling, processing and marketing system was conducted in urban
and peri-urban dairy production systems of Bahir Dar and Mecha districts of Amhara region.
The data was collected between June and September, 2017. Purposive sampling was employed
to select representative kebeles in both urban & peri-urban dairy production systems.
Accordingly, 2 urban and six peri-urban kebeles were selected. A total of 264 households were
selected by using systematic random sampling techniques. Questionnaire based interview,
focus group and key informant discussions and monitoring techniques were employed to collect
both quantitative and qualitative data. To complement the survey based information, 24
households (12 in each production systems) who had lactating cow were voluntarily selected
and monitored for a month. The result indicated that, the average cattle herd size of households
was 8.76+ 4.81heads, with no significant variations (P>0.05) between the production systems.
According to the survey study milk production for crossbred dairy cows were 12.12+ 2.04 and
7.62+ in urban and peri-urban production systems, respectively. Indigenous dairy cows were
only found in peri-urban production system with the average daily milk yield of 2.76+ 1.44
litters. The breeding systems used by respondents in both production systems were AI (58%),
natural mating (15.5%) and both AI and natural mating (26.5%), respectively. The dairy cattle
breed used for milk production in both production systems were crossbred cows (56.1%), local
breed cows (18.9%) and both local and cross breed cows (25%). Major feed resources used by
the households were crop residue and hay, industrial by products (oil cake, bran and local
beverage,) natural pasture grazing and concentrate feeds. Water sources for animals in both
V I
production systems were river, hand dug well, supplied pipe/thank and spring water. All (100%)
dairy cow producers in both production systems had an experience of processing milk in to
other milk products. In the urban production system only 18.2% milk was processed for
marketing whereas, 89.4% in peri-urban production system were processed for marketing.
Guard (59.1%), clay pot (18.2%) and plastic container (13.6%) in the urban production system
and gourd and clay pot 71.7% and 26.3%, respectively were used as milk processing materials.
Aluminum/stainless steel 31.8 and 21.2%, plastic container 51.5% and 41.9% and guard 16.7%
and 30.8% in urban and peri-urban production systems, respectively were used as milk and
milk products handling materials. Raw milk and butter 81.8% and 18.2% in urban and 31.3%
and 68.7% in peri-urban production systems, respectively were the major identified marketable
products. Both formal and informal marketing systems were existed in the production systems.
Formal marketing was the dominant marketing system in the urban production system. The
dairy production in the study areas was constrained mainly by shortage of sustainable land
(84.8%) and high feed price (81.8%) in the urban and market fluctuation (83.53%) and disease
problem (72.2%) in peri-urban production systems, respectively. The increasing demand for
milk and milk products (81.8%) and the presence of dairy cooperatives, milk processors and
hotels/cafes (74.2%) in urban and the presence of cooperatives, milk collectors and cafes
(74.6%) and government and non-government supports (65.9%) in peri-urban production
systems were the major ranked opportunities for sustainable dairy sector development in the
study areas. Generally, the author suggested that solutions for the constraints and use properly
the identified opportunities can improve the dairy sector in the study areas.
Key words: Dairy, production system, marketing, processing, urban and peri-urban