Abstract:
The main purpose of this studl' was to cl'aluute the implemel/ta/ion 0/ school ill/jJrOl'e/lient
progralll il/ prillw/~jl schools 0/ ellebsie woreda. The study was conducted il/ j () jJl'ill/OI)'
schoo.,'.
J() principals.25 teachers. 75 studellts .20 outco/illnllllit}' representatives, 5 l\'(Ircda
educalion jJrofessionals and onc 1'Ihe(/(1 11'ere sc!ected as a sall/ple 0/ the studl' usin,!!, J'(/Ildoll/
sWllplilig
and (J1'ailahilit.l' sWllplin}!. t{'chl/ielucs, Data ll'ae collected tlJrlJ/l,!!,h (IUCsliol/l/aire,
il/l('J"riell', and docuII/ent allah·.,is alldjidd OhSi'/TtlliulI all it al,\(jllalil(llil'e!.I' usin,!!, pac{,lIh/~e,
The main findings of the study are :-Domains of SIP were not implemented properly,Moillfl'
parents, students. teachers hal'e 1011' OII'areness ahol/t the SIP, Quality ofedllcotion and sllldelils
result in different subject is under question,Com/llunit)' participalion in the area o/Ihl.' jlrO}!./'(1I11 is
10w,Educational inputs of the school were not fulfilled. Woreda educatioll proj'essiollals a//(I
clusler supervisors were nol supporl the jwincipols, There is a lack olsupjlorl he/l1'L'l!n or (III/1m,\!.
.\111// //"'II/hers, 7here is no \I'ell or,\!,(///i::ed (lnd (I/Ipro/lril!ltl teod!i
l
/?, slrate,c.;es (//,,1 1lI,'I/wJ\' lI\cd
h,' the tc(/chers, Finalh', de/1c1lding Oil Ihe resIII/ of't!le (indillg. dF'eli)'e illlf/lelllei//otioll oj SII)
dOll/ains, (I\\,arcness creotion LlIIIOII~ s{(lke ludden. j(/I.:fcJrs I!/(/I lILf"c'f (filii/ill' (!/ e,,'lIull;OIl i,l Ii",
prograll/ should be cOl/sidered I.ellin,l!. cO/lllllullitl· /wrtil'ipatio!l ill scl/(jols ouil'i/.\'. COIII;1I1/0IlS
Io/IOlI' lip and training a/stake I/(}ic!ers. lrell o/}!,illli::l.'c! /,ro(c,\sio!lL:1 Slljll'IT;S;Oll Irae .\(11111.' utlhe
recoII/ll/endatioli that ll'ere reco/ll//IC'lukd
