This study is conducted with ultimate objective of analysis on some selected football skill training qualities of project participant and nonparticipant trainees: with reference to koma secondary school students. Professionals spend a great deal of time and effort trying to improve athletic performance. Even as coaches evaluate each athlete by using the results of a vast battery of tests, there has been considerable speculation and discussion about the strength and weaknesses of experimental and control group players in koma secondary school male projects. The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome of strength, speed, endurance, agility, balance, and coordination scores have on both group participants' status. The research design appropriate for this studyis quantitative research methods in quasi-experimental research design to analyze between project participants and non-participants on some training qualities of football found in the Amhara region, south gonder zone,estie woreda with reference to koma secondary school male student projects. At Koma secondary school, there is one male football project, which has a total population of 75 players in compound, among this 50 individuals selected randomly to conduct the study from Koma secondary school students, between two months were used in this study. The subjects were grouped into two groups. The two groups were project participants and non-participants of the same sex. Test results were taken from both the control group (n = 25) and the experimental group (N = 25), by using a simple random sampling method or lottery system. The raw data was statistically analyzed using central tendency and the Excel 2019 procedure, as well as row score norms. Each subject participated in a series of tests conducted by the researcher. Project participants and non-participants were analyzed for their skills on six different tests. The tests used in this study consisted of the squat test (strength), the 300 yard shuttle test (speed), the home step test (endurance), the zigzag test (agility), the stand-stork test (balance), and foot-eye coordination (coordination). Based on the findings, it can be concluded that the results of the central tendency procedure and the raw score norms showed that project participants were better than non-participants in all six tests. But according to the raw score norm, project participants score low in two variables, i.e., balance and coordination.