Abstract:
The population of Ethiopia is growing fast, however; the productive capacity of the land to
produce food is limited. The level of participation and contribution of income from non-farm
activities to the households’ income is very little compared to the myriad potential of the
sector. This study aims to identify the determinants of farmers participation and the amount of
income derived from non-farm activities using evidence from four rural kebeles in Enebsie
Sar Mider Woreda, Southwest Amhara, Northern Ethiopia. The results are based on data
collected from a survey of 191 households selected by systematic random sampling technique,
four Focus Group Discussion (FGD), and five Key Informant Interview (KIIs). Both binary
logit and censored Tobit models are used to estimate determinants of participation and
income of non-farm activities. From nineteen hypothetical explanatory variables included in
the analysis ten variables from Logit and ten variables from Tobit models affected non-farm
participation and non-farm income respectively with a 10% level of significance. The key
findings that age of the household head, annual agricultural income, and amount of
remittance received by the family were statistically significant variables to affect negatively
both participation and income of non-farm activities. On the other hand the number of family
size, food security status, frequency of extension contact, access to mass media, and access to
technical training were statistically significant and affected both participation and income of
non-farm activities positively. Cooperative membership, the distance of residence from a
market center statistically, and negatively affected only participation of non-farm activities.
Finally, the amount of irrigable land negatively and the amount of credit borrowed positively
affected the income from non-farm activities. The survey also showed that the contribution of
the non-farm economy to the overall income of households is about 9.7%, it is very
lowcompared with its potential. Finally, based on the core findings the office of Agriculture,
office of food security, and office of Technical vocational and enterprise development
recommended to provide support and monitoring more focus for younger households,
assigning technically skilled extension workers in rural kebeles, to access credit after
preconditions approved, and to minimize workload and provide continuous capacity building
through technical training for those PSNP clients.
Keywords: rural household, farmer, non-farm, participation, income, livelihood, Ethiopia1
Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION