| dc.description.abstract |
Nation-building is a foundational objective of modern statehood, though many states around
the world continue to grapple with challenges. Ethiopia’s efforts throughout its modern
political history present a compelling case of structural impediments to its nation-building
undertakings. This dissertation investigates the structural factors that have hindered the
nation-building undertakings of four successive Ethiopian regimes. Adopting a qualitative
approach rooted in a constructivist paradigm, the study utilizes historical analysis and
thematic coding to evaluate an extensive array of primary and secondary sources. The findings
of this study show that, irrespective of ideological and institutional shifts over the decades,
each regime (since the 1930s) consistently leveraged excessive authoritarianism and state
coercion to centralize absolute power. This coercion-based state centralization left no space
for alternative political voices, driving opposition movements toward armed struggle—a
trajectory compounded by a dominant socio-cultural matrix that historically normalizes
political violence and consolidates centralized power. Furthermore, the cultivation of a
negotiated national identity or shared political vision has been blocked by the absence of
consensus among the country’s elite. As such, though it is not the only factor, it consistently
yields recurrent domestic conflicts. On a political-economic level, the lack of structural
transformation has narrowed the state’s fiscal base. It leaves the country dependent on
subsistence agriculture and land resources rigidly controlled by ruling elites to sustain
exclusive patron-client networks and systemic corruption. Finally, the study demonstrates that
external factors compound Ethiopia's internal challenges; the turbulent geopolitics of the Horn
of Africa—characterized by transboundary water disputes, maritime access dilemmas, and
superpower rivalries—have served as persistent destabilizing forces. Ultimately, this
dissertation concludes that the challenge Ethiopia faces in its quest for peace, stability, and
democracy is an interconnected crisis born of centralized authoritarianism, elite discord,
economic stagnation, and regional vulnerability. The findings imply that, rather than continued
reliance on coercive approaches, more inclusive and accountable political institutions,
broader elite consensus, structural economic transformation, and constructive regional
engagement are more conducive to sustainable nation-building. Future research could further
examine how these interconnected structural challenges interact over time and undertake
comparative studies of Ethiopia and other multi-ethnic states to identify institutional pathways
that can foster inclusive and sustainable nation-building. |
en_US |