| dc.description.abstract |
The state- and nation-building approaches pursued by the imperial regime in pre-1974 Ethiopia
have been subject to divergent interpretations. The role of the Amhara ruling class in this process
and their use of Amharic as a lingua franca have been widely interpreted as a form of Amhara
domination over non-Amhara groups. This interpretation has played a significant role in the
emergence of competing nationalisms in the country. Situated within this broader context, the
present study seeks to examine the factors that contributed to the shift in the modus operandi of
Amhara nationalism, from peaceful to violent forms, by investigating its origins and resistance
strategies. A qualitative approach was employed, using data gathered through interviews, focus
group discussions, media content analysis and document review. The collected data were analyzed
through a combination of thematic analysis and critical discourse analysis. The study is
theoretically grounded in social constructionist theory and draws on literature addressing the
enduring legacy of colonialism in shaping nationalism in Africa. Findings indicate that the
narrative portraying the Amhara as historical oppressors and the subsequent structural violence
directed against them are at the root of Amhara nationalism. This Amhara-oppressor discourse,
rooted in Orientalist interpretations of history, was instrumentalized by Fascist Italy during its
occupation of Ethiopia (1936-1941) as a divide-and-rule tactic. Following liberation, this anti
Amhara narrative was adopted by various actors and became institutionalized within the ethnic
federal architecture of post-1991 Ethiopia. In response, Amhara elites launched a resistance
movement that blended both violent and non-violent tactics, contributing to the national leadership
change in 2018. Although the new administration pledged to end ethnic-based attacks, structural
violence against the Amhara has persisted, leading to the radicalization of Amhara nationalism.
Based on these findings, the study concludes that Amhara nationalism is an evolving phenomenon,
with its ideology and modus operandi continuously shifting in response to changing conditions.
Moreover, the failure to address the legitimate grievances underlying Amhara nationalism risks
exacerbating the broader national crisis, as reflected in the ongoing conflict between the Amhara
Fano and the government. Accordingly, future research should scrutinize the nature, actors and
dynamics of this conflict to inform viable pathways toward a peaceful resolution. |
en_US |