dc.description.abstract |
Land is the most valuable natural resource for humankind. Over the decades, many
factors, such as lack of land policy, weak legal frameworks and institutions, tenure
insecurity, and mismanagement of land, have contributed to the depletion of natural
resources in developing countries. In Ethiopia, as part of the national effort to ensure
land tenure security and improve natural resources management, the government has
implemented rural land registration and cadaster program and issued second-level land
certificates for landholders. In the land administration process of the Amhara region of
Ethiopia, legislation gaps to address cadastral issues, organizational capacity gaps,
participation, cadastral data management, and problems of tenure insecurity in peri urban areas that challenged land governance are the main problems. The objective of
this study was, therefore, to examine the rural cadastral practice and its contributions to
good land governance in the Amhara region, Ethiopia. A mixed research method was
employed, and data were secured from pertinent participants from all segments of
stakeholders, landholders, and land experts working from the regional bureau down to
grass root level. The study also reviewed the literature to design an evaluation
framework to assess the quality of the rural cadastral system of the region. Data were
analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.
The findings indicated that the framework developed for the quality assessment was
found to be an essential tool to evaluate the performance of rural cadastral practices.
The study revealed that the rural land cadastral practice and its contribution to good
land governance prevailed in multiple results. The study identified the strengths and gaps
of the rural land cadastral system of the region, which underpinned the understanding of
institutional and technical arrangements and statuses at the policy, management, and
operational level. To address the gaps in cadastral practices in the region, this study
suggested undertaking actions leading to land policy revision, carrying out structural
rearrangement, spatial and legal framework formulation, and capacity building in
technical, institutional, and material aspects at operational levels of land administration
institutions. These interventions need government commitment, political will and active
support from non-government organizations. |
en_US |