<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Agronomy</title>
<link href="http://ir.bdu.edu.et/handle/123456789/1738" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://ir.bdu.edu.et/handle/123456789/1738</id>
<updated>2026-07-13T14:58:11Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-07-13T14:58:11Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Optimization of Sowing Time of Kabuli Type Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L.), Under Rectangular Planting Geometry In Rainfall Deficit Areas of Eastern Amhara</title>
<link href="http://ir.bdu.edu.et/handle/123456789/16877" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Sisay Bisetegn</name>
</author>
<id>http://ir.bdu.edu.et/handle/123456789/16877</id>
<updated>2026-06-16T08:41:39Z</updated>
<published>2025-05-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Optimization of Sowing Time of Kabuli Type Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L.), Under Rectangular Planting Geometry In Rainfall Deficit Areas of Eastern Amhara
Sisay Bisetegn
Improved agronomic practices increases yield potential of chickpea in different agro ecology of the&#13;
Country, Crop yield decline due to climate change and improper agronomic practices are the major&#13;
bottlenecks to sustainable crop production in Ethiopia. ”This field experiment was conducted with the&#13;
objective of Optimization of Sowing Time of Kabuli Type Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), Under&#13;
Rectangular Planting Geometry in Rainfall Deficit Areas of Eastern Amhara”, during 2023/2024 main&#13;
cropping season. 'Kabuli' type chickpea (variety harbu) was testing crop, the experiments involved a&#13;
combination of three planting date (Agust10, 17 and 24), three Intra (5cm, 10cm and 15cm) and three Inter&#13;
(20cm, 30cm and 40cm) row spacing, Laid out in a randomized complete block design with three&#13;
replications. Nine populations ranging from 44 to 380 plants plot-&#13;
1&#13;
 were also included in the investigation. &#13;
Data was, yield, and yield components were collected and analyzed using SAS-GLM software. statically&#13;
analysis showed that  most yield and yield related parameter’s, (Number of branch plant-&#13;
,plant height,&#13;
Number of pod plant-&#13;
1&#13;
, Dry biomass yield, Seed yield, and vigority index had significance difference on the&#13;
main effects of  Planting dates, intra and inter row spacing’s., similarly the two way interaction of intra&#13;
and inter row spacing’s significantly affects seed  yields. Hundred seed weight and Harvest index are&#13;
significant on the three way interaction of the test crop. The combination of treatments means also  showed&#13;
highly significantly difference (P &lt; 0.001) on almost all agronomic attributes of testing crop, the highest&#13;
grain yield,(3087kg/ha-1) was recorded  in early planting (august10) and medium(10cm) intra row spacing&#13;
and from the narrower inter row spacing (20cm), this treatments combination had also 61.45 % yield&#13;
advantage than  the lowest yield (1163.4kg/ha-&#13;
1&#13;
) recorded from planting date august 24 with 15cm intra&#13;
and 30cm inter row spacing’s, similarly Highest yield (1673.5kgha-&#13;
1&#13;
), (2072.3kgha-&#13;
1&#13;
1&#13;
) and (2033.9kgha-&#13;
),&#13;
obtained from  the main effects  planting date 10Agust,10cm Intra row spacing and 20cm Inter row&#13;
spacing’s respectively  Partial budget analysis results indicates that the highest net benefit,&#13;
(313,547ETBha-&#13;
1&#13;
) obtained from the two way interaction (10cm intra * 20cm inter row spacing’s).&#13;
Marginal Rate of Return between the two un-dominated treatments is 283.9%, which is well above the&#13;
commonly accepted minimum threshold of 100% for investment in smallholder agriculture (according to&#13;
CIMMYT, 1988) standards. In conclusion early planting medium (10cm) and narrower (20cm) Inter row&#13;
spacing’s can increases chickpea production and productivity in the study area and similar agro ecologies,&#13;
however since  the experiment was conducted  for one season at one location, this research should be&#13;
repeated over a season and location, to reach more conclusive recommendations. &#13;
1
</summary>
<dc:date>2025-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Impacts of Climate Change and Management Practices on Potato (Solanum Tuberosum L.) Production in Tropical Highland Regions of Ethiopia</title>
<link href="http://ir.bdu.edu.et/handle/123456789/15656" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Ademe, Dereje</name>
</author>
<id>http://ir.bdu.edu.et/handle/123456789/15656</id>
<updated>2024-02-21T10:21:13Z</updated>
<published>2022-04-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Impacts of Climate Change and Management Practices on Potato (Solanum Tuberosum L.) Production in Tropical Highland Regions of Ethiopia
Ademe, Dereje
Various adaptation options are available to the anticipated climate change and variability impacts &#13;
on potato production systems in the study area. However, impact estimation and adaptation &#13;
potential evaluation are critical tasks to identify the most viable adaptation options. This study was &#13;
thus designed to (i) perform climate analysis, (ii) evaluate the performance of SUBSTOR-Potato &#13;
model, (iii) evaluate impacts of climate change and management practices, and (iv) assess the &#13;
adaptation role of management practices on potato production in various agroecosystems (AESs) &#13;
found in the Choke Mountain Watersheds of Northwest Ethiopian highlands. A simulation study &#13;
conducted for climate change and management practices impacts assessment using a crop &#13;
simulation model. Two potato varieties (medium maturing and late maturing), three planting dates &#13;
(March 01, April 01 and June 01) determined based on information from climate analysis and key &#13;
informants, and four nitrogen rates (0 kg/ha, 40 kg/ha, 80 kg/ha, and 120 kg/ha N) were selected &#13;
to evaluate their adaptation impacts on potato yield in three climate periods and two scenarios.&#13;
Input data needed for the study collected from primary and secondary sources. Climate analysis &#13;
performed at landscape level, whereas the model calibrated and evaluated using field measured &#13;
data from three AESs. Water limited potential yield, yield gap, and climate change and &#13;
management practices impact assessment performed using a validated model. Results revealed that&#13;
all AES warmed significantly in all seasons over the historical analysis period (1981–2016) with &#13;
higher magnitude of trend in high elevation AES. Rainfall variability was also large across AES, &#13;
with largest interannual variability found in the dry season. Trends in temperature extremes are &#13;
generally consistent across sites and AES, but with different implications for agricultural activities in the different AES. Future projections showed significant wetting and increase in precipitation&#13;
(8–1015 mm additional rainfall) and temperature extremes (More summer days, few chill days, &#13;
and higher day and night temperature) across AES. High inter-annual variability of rainfall onset &#13;
(49–84 days) and cessation (41–66 days) dates was observed, and length of the growing period &#13;
exhibited a significant trend (extended by 6–17 days in some areas and shortened by up to 7 days &#13;
in other sites) in some AES and greater variability in higher elevation AES (78 – 102 days). &#13;
Significant increasing trends and variability in dry spells and onset date may severely affect crop &#13;
production that necessitate the revision of AES specific crop production calendar to minimize crop &#13;
failure. The results also emphasize the importance of AES-based improved seasonal weather &#13;
forecasts and tailored climate information services to guide farm decisions. It also concluded that &#13;
AES level analysis could better provide actionable information for decision makers and growers &#13;
than site specific and scattered studies. Model evaluation results confirmed that SUBSTOR-Potato &#13;
model has strong ability to reproduce observed values and is suitable to simulate tuber yield in &#13;
tropical highlands and similar agroecologies. Results of simulation studies showed that planting &#13;
season temperature and rainfall had increased in the future climate periods with possible impacts &#13;
on potato yield. Results further revealed that climate change in the area showed a wider range yield &#13;
impact (0.25% to 281%) across periods and sites compared to the current practice (6 – 41 t/ha) and &#13;
major benefit is found in high altitude AESs and in the mid-century period. Future climate change &#13;
will also resulted in change in water limited potential yield that ranges from –7 t/ha (in AES3) to &#13;
40 t/ha (in AES5) in mid-century climate period under RCP8.5. Adaptation option assessment &#13;
results showed that switching to late maturing variety (-15.4%–180.3%), delayed (June 01) &#13;
planting time (4.7 – 21.8%) and high nitrogen (120 kg/ha) rate (9.55–28.8%) gave better results. &#13;
Adaptation role assessment showed that late and mid-planting of late variety with higher nitrogen &#13;
rates had positive impacts under the current climate and strong adaptation impact in the near-term &#13;
period. In the mid-century climate period, mid-planting of both varieties with higher nitrogen rates &#13;
had impact in the current climate with adaptation role in the future climate. Thus, moving the &#13;
planting time to mid-planting time would have strong adaptation role and minimize GHG &#13;
emissions, thereby balances trade-off between productivity and mitigation activities.
</summary>
<dc:date>2022-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>EFFECTS OF SEEDLING AGE AND TRANSPLANTING DATE ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF TEF [Eragrostis tef (ZUCC.)  TROTTER] AT KOBO, NORTH EASTERN ETHIOPIA</title>
<link href="http://ir.bdu.edu.et/handle/123456789/13049" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Tizazu Mulugeta</name>
</author>
<id>http://ir.bdu.edu.et/handle/123456789/13049</id>
<updated>2022-02-23T13:09:02Z</updated>
<published>2022-02-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">EFFECTS OF SEEDLING AGE AND TRANSPLANTING DATE ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF TEF [Eragrostis tef (ZUCC.)  TROTTER] AT KOBO, NORTH EASTERN ETHIOPIA
Tizazu Mulugeta
A field experiment was conducted during the main cropping season of 2014 at Koba, North&#13;
Eastern Ethiopia, to investigate the effects of seedling age and transplanting date on the yield&#13;
and yield components ofte.ff A factorial combination of four seedling ages (15, 20, 25 and 30&#13;
days old teff seedlings) and three transplanting date, (first transplanting date, second week of&#13;
July), transplanting delayed by ten days after the first transplanting date and transplanting &#13;
delayed by 20 days after the first transplanting date) was laid out in a randomized complete&#13;
block design (RCBD) with three replications using improved teff variety called Zobel (DZ -01-&#13;
1821) as a test crop. Phonological traits and yield and yield components were taken as&#13;
experimental variables . Seedling age resulted in highly significant differences (p &lt; 0. 01) for&#13;
all Phenological traits and yield and yield components except straw yield which was&#13;
significant at(P &lt; 0. 05). Transplanting date was also highly significant (P &lt; 0. OJ) affected &#13;
days to physiological maturity, number of effective tillers plant", number of total tillers plant &#13;
1, &#13;
EFFECTS OF SEEDLING AGE AND TRANSPLANTING DATE ON&#13;
YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF TEF [Eragrostis tef (ZUCC.) &#13;
TROTTER] AT KOBO , NORTH EASTERN ETHIOPIA &#13;
BY &#13;
Tizazu Mulugeta &#13;
Major Advisor: Dr.Getachew Alemayehu &#13;
ABSTRACT &#13;
panicle length, grain yield, biomass yield and harvest index. But transplanting date didn't&#13;
show any significant effect onl 000 grain weight, plant height and straw yield. The interaction&#13;
effect of transplanting date and seedling age was also highly significant (P &lt; 0. 01) on all &#13;
Phonological traits and yield and yield components except straw yield. Grain yield of teff had&#13;
positively and significantly correlation with all yield contributing parameters except days to &#13;
heading and straw yield. Higher grain yields of 7.29 and 6.91 t ha·' were obtained by&#13;
transplanting of 25 and 20 days old seedlings on second week of July, respectively. Hence,&#13;
considering the growth and yield results of the present study, transplanting of 2 5 and 20 days &#13;
old seedlings on second we~k of July can be suggested v~i~~e~'$..uction
</summary>
<dc:date>2022-02-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>SEEDING RATE AND TIME OF LUPINE (Lupinus a/bus L.} FOOD BARLEY  (Hordeum vulgare L.) INTERCROPPING IN GOZAMIN DISTRICT, NORTHWESTERN ETHIOPIA</title>
<link href="http://ir.bdu.edu.et/handle/123456789/13046" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Sewnet Getahun</name>
</author>
<id>http://ir.bdu.edu.et/handle/123456789/13046</id>
<updated>2022-02-23T12:51:44Z</updated>
<published>2022-02-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">SEEDING RATE AND TIME OF LUPINE (Lupinus a/bus L.} FOOD BARLEY  (Hordeum vulgare L.) INTERCROPPING IN GOZAMIN DISTRICT, NORTHWESTERN ETHIOPIA
Sewnet Getahun
Food barley and lupine are food crops often traditionally grown in intercropping in north western&#13;
Ethiopia. But, there is no any documented information about the optimum seeding rate and time of&#13;
lupine intercropping with barley in Gozamin District northwestern Ethiopia. Hence, a field &#13;
experiment was conducted on seeding rate and time of intercropping of lupine with barley in &#13;
Gozamin District to determine the appropriate planting density and time of lupine intercropping for&#13;
harnessing the possible maximum productivity of barley fields. Factorial combinations offour time&#13;
of lupine intercropping (on the same date, two weeks, four weeks and six weeks after barley sown)&#13;
and three planting densities of lupine (5cm, 1 Ocm, l 5cm intra-row spacing between lupine plants)&#13;
as well as two sole cropping of barley and lupine were laid out in randomized compete block&#13;
design (RCBD) with three replications. The results indicated that there was no significant&#13;
difference among all treatment combinations on phenological, vegetative growth and yield related&#13;
parameters of barley. Except days to 50% emergence and number of grain per pod. However,&#13;
highly significant differences among treatment combinations were observed for all growth and&#13;
yield parameters of lupine. In the intercropping system of lupine with barley, the base crop barley&#13;
completely dominated lupine in all treatment combinations. The land equivalent ratio (LER) was&#13;
more than one in most cases to show more advantages of intercropping of lupine with barley than&#13;
their sole cropping separately. The highest LER (1.48) and monitory advantage index (MAI)&#13;
(17011.8) were recorded in the intercropping of lupine simultaneously with barley at low planting&#13;
density which was intercropped with l 5cm intra-row spacing between lupine crop. The economic&#13;
analysis had also confirmed that this treatment combinations (lupine intercropping simultaneously&#13;
with barley at low planting density) gave the best advantage in the study area that can be&#13;
recommended for further adoption by barley producing farmers. But, to come up with pragmatic&#13;
recommendations for wider utilization of intercropping of lupine with barley, similar studies should &#13;
be carried out further in different areas and cropping seasons.
</summary>
<dc:date>2022-02-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
